Skip to main content

Rebirth of Frankenstein

As a law abiding subject of the crown, and a passive and assertive 21st century citizen, I as does every other upright member of society, who embraces decorum in civilised hemispheres and lawful assertiveness when the thump of the tyrannical fist bullies the good and the peaceful, with beastly endeavours, am also a human with lawful rights.  The problems which comes to the surface when weak leaders are trusted, with power by the people, is that the children are at risk from their aggressive and narcissistic libidos. 

The prison doors are thus swung open and the murderous terrorist sent home on private jets, to a great and utopia welcome.  Those with virtue and passivity are then targeted as enemies of the state and without warning pushed into the global vanguard, with an attempt to gain strength and greatness, from torturing the humble without clemency.  The rule of law is replaced with criminal and abusive games, free love is replaced with the kinky dungeons of the nightmarish psycho and torture is taught to the children and the impressionable, as to what fun extremism can be when met out to society.  Then grows in the hearts of the innocent children, the foundations of sex pot psychos, then comes in to the hearts of their beautiful mothers a vision of woe as to what will become of their imaginative child who may one day dare to enter the world of business.

If the sex pot despot ruler, thinks that the issue is bigger than his head, he might ask for the assistance of a foreign power.  They then all ally themselves against the humble citizen, who may just want to earn a living, which is conducive to his talent, choose a woman he deems appropriate and live a subjective happy life.  When they use their machine to pervert him with their twisted psychotic fantasies and he repels it, with an insight to Newton’s Third Law of Motion, their vanity tells them that they are too important for a person to question their criminal sexual tortures, on them and then enters the stage of plot. 

As they are allied against him as they view him to be bigger than them as a whole, they enter into rage and then evil tidings.  They attempt to outdo each other with evil torture, and as the world sometimes are watching they pay criminals to act out their psychotic evil in the streets.  They also use the police as a gestapo to, instead of solving crime and creating civil order, as a tool of terror.  They become the gestapo of modern Britannia and the politicians’ storm trooper arm for terror. 
If not successful in meeting out sexual laboratory experiments, they attempt to plot the ultimate crimes of the despots, evil imaginations.  When the political gang does this, they try to use their international ally as their figure of incrimination.  This British island is not a colony and it is thus up to the politicians of our parliamentary democracy to advance the rights of man, as the foundation of an epoch of modernity. 

When they allow criminal kinky despots to join their gang as a smokescreen for their terrorism, this is not good.  What this produces is a new world order where state sponsored terrorism is the order of the day.  One is thus likely to be the victim of psychotic goons from the other side of the world because he dared to desire the natural element of feminine woman and the stabilising normality of a salary or wage.  The process and execution, of the sex pot despot might then create the policy of the dungeon of doom.  As they are not great enough to view discretion to be the better part of valour, they target the children of bliss, with an endeavour to the moulding and manufacture of horny Frankenstein!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FOR WANTON MALICE

The powers that be, does not like me to write bloggs, or express myself under the Human Rights Act 1998.  I was once told a saying by a Northampton brethren, which still holds true to me today.  He said, "It is better to be hated for being who you are, that to be loved for being someone you are not."  Such great words, I then thought and it defines to me the virtues of integrity, the virtues of humility and the virtues of uprightness.  One must sometimes be hated by evil men, to be noble and good.  Our radical politicians have caused me much trouble, over the past 12 years, by stealing my wages and implementing terror on my passive personification.  Wanton malice have up warded the dregs of tyranny, from whence carnal plot and mischief have plagued our once democratic periphery.   This link defines the centuries old British government policy of divide and rule .  It was a clever and sometimes woeful strategy, that created an empire, of...

An Archaic Etonian Musket

On this day of our Lord, 14th August 2013, Britain’s once proud reputation as an island of jurisprudence and a subjective cloak of morality, has been seriously challenged by a Toffs’ Rebellion .  This challenge to our rights, have made me question the paradigm of our democratic status-quo.  This new polity defined as a Magna Britannicus Fascismo,   as created an Orwellian ubiquity of intrusion and terror.  Big Brother does not effect everyone directly, though the indirect effects has built up an unstoppable presence to the periphery and has now begun an unfettered attack on the children, without clemency or civilised protocols.  This offensive as been an attack on their innocence, virtue, culture and values.  This essay will  attempt to understand the headman of the Toffs’ Rebellion and ask the question, “Is this a war against the Age of Enlightenment’s values and principles?”  If it is, then will absolutism return to a digital age with the ...

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...