Skip to main content

BIG PICTURES

THERE IS NO GAMES UNLESS THERE IS LAW.  ALL I EVER ASKED FOR ARE THE LAWS WHICH EVERYONE IS BORN WITH AND EQUAL UNDER.
IS THAT ASKING FOR TOO MUCH?

IS PICKING ONE MAN OUT OF FIFTY NINE POINT TWO MILLION PEOPLE AND, BECAUSE OF JEALOUS MOTIVATION, TRYING TO STOP HIM PICKING HIS OWN PARTNER AND HIDING SEXUAL CAMERAS IN HIS ROOM, DEATH, BLIND, RAPE, AND FORCING HIM INTO MENTAL ASYLUMS, TO NAME JUST A FEW OF THEIR CRIMES, NOT ASKING TOO MUCH?  IF CHOOSING MY OWN SWEETHEART AND TREATED EQUALY UNDER LAW ARE TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR, THEN I AM GREATER THAN THE COUNTRY'S FIFTY NINE POINT TWO MILLION PEOPLE TOGETHER, AS THEY HAVE HAD TO JUMP OVER THEM TO GIVE ME SPECIAL TREATMENT.  THAT WEAKENS THE STATE AND IF THIS COUNTRY DID NOT HAVE A QUEEN, AND WAS A REPUBLIC BRITANNIA, THEN IT WOULD BE ON A CATASTROPHIC CRISIS MUCH MORE THAT THIS ONE WE ARE NOW FACING.

THE KINKY ALLIANCE OF BLOODY HILLARY AND HER FOUR BRITISH CORGIS, HAVE BLOWN EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTION AND CREATED CRISIS OUT OF NOTHING.  THAT IS WHY IT ALWAYS PAYS TO HAVE GREAT LEADERS HAS POWER DOES NOT GO TO THEIR HEADS AND THEY CAN THUS SEE THE BIG PICTURES AND NOT BE PANICED BY NOTHING. 

I HAVE NOT BROKEN A SINGLE LAW WHICH MAKES ME NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CRISIS WHICH IS MUCH MORE BIGGER THAN ANTONY EDEN'S EXIT FROM SUEZ.  IF I AM THAT GREAT THAT I HAVE TO BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY THAN THE
OTHER FIFTY NINE POINT TWO MILLION PEOPLE, CALL ME 'CHRISTOPHER THE GREAT,' BUILD BE A CASTLE AND GIVE ME A TITLE JUST UNDERNEATH THE QUEEN WHO REALLY IS GREAT.  I DID NOT MENTION MY SWEETHEART IN THAT LAST SENTENCE BECAUSE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME, BRITISH POLITICIANS ONLY EVER TRIED TO PAIR THE KING OR QUEEN, AND THEY HAD CHOICE.  MY LOVE LIFE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU AND THE LAW IS BEHIND ME. 

IF YOU WANT TO HIDE YOUR JEALOUS OBSESSION THAT YOU HAVE PLAGUED MY LIFE WITH OVER THE LAST ELEVEN YEARS, BY COMMITING VIOLENCE ON ME, THAT WILL NOT HIDE IT.  AS A LAW ABIDING CITIZEN I WILL THUS BE A MARTYR OF JURISPRUDENCE.  I DO NOT WISH TO BE A MATYR, I AM NOT A SOLDIER, I AM NOT A DICTATOR AND I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICS. 

THIS IS YOUR CRISIS AND WHAT EVER YOUR JEALOUS EMOTIONAL CONTRADICTIONS, THAT IS YOUR OPPINION, I WILL BE TREATED EQUALLY UNDER LAW AND HAVE JUSTICE FOR THE LAST ELEVEN YEARS OF MADNESS THAT YOU HAVE INFECTED MY SPHERE WITH.  I WILL NOT BE TOLD TO CHANGE BY YOU, I WILL TELL YOU TO CHANGE, I WILL TELL YOU TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE AND I WILL TELL YOU TO GROW UP.  IF YOU CANNOT LEAD WITHOUT RESORTING TO TYRANNY AND TERRORISM, THEN THAT IS YOUR PROBLEM AS I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICS.  IF YOU COME INTO MY WORLD THE WAY THAT YOUR KINKY ALLIANCE HAS AND TRY TO RULE WITH FEAR AND PERVERSION, THEN I WILL NOT ACCEPT IT UNDER ANY SITUATION.  I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU LIKE BLOODY HILLARY, IT IS NOT ABOUT EMOTION OR OPPINION, IT IS ABOUT LAW.  IF YOU FIVE ARE NOT BIG ENOUGH TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURES, THATS YOUR ISSUES.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Death of Keynes

The Cardinal Rules of Democracy  & Employment for a Digital Age   John Maynard Keynes is considered by many, as one of the greatest thinkers of the 20 th century.   A descendant of Norman conquering feudalists, at Eton he traced his ancestors thus far.   Born in 1883, at a time when the sun never set on the British Empire and Britain was in an empirical age of Splendid Isolation, he studied mathematics at Cambridge, where he was advised to study economics.   He became iconic in an age of Georgian reinvention.   Females were allowed to study at Cambridge, the Suffragette movement was in militant full swing and the Bloomsbury sect was the cultural hub of the classical thinkers and politicians of the time.   Virginia Wolfe and Lady Ottoline Morrell were just two of those who challenged the established views on anything from female suffrage and the British Empire.   Keynes became a member of this iconoclastic movement in 1902.  ...
1 comment
Read more

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...
1 comment
Read more

Civil Liberties

When in previous blogs I wrote about all of the government criminal trickery (politicks) when representing the British electorate, another abuse has come to light.  Forced homelessness, is another tactic practiced in the UK and USA.  If the British government forces you to the USA, which they define has your home, if their Frankenstein gay experimental tricks do not work, then they make you homeless in the vast population there.  Or they will send you back to the UK to be homeless or hospitalised in one of the vast number of UK towns or cities.  I would write more on this, but the authorities have been sending medical staff to my home to make certain that I am swallowing my medicine pills.  So now I am finding it difficult to write.  The only reasons they say I am unwell is I am straight and Afro-Caribbean.  
Post a Comment
Read more