Skip to main content

BIG PICTURES

THERE IS NO GAMES UNLESS THERE IS LAW.  ALL I EVER ASKED FOR ARE THE LAWS WHICH EVERYONE IS BORN WITH AND EQUAL UNDER.
IS THAT ASKING FOR TOO MUCH?

IS PICKING ONE MAN OUT OF FIFTY NINE POINT TWO MILLION PEOPLE AND, BECAUSE OF JEALOUS MOTIVATION, TRYING TO STOP HIM PICKING HIS OWN PARTNER AND HIDING SEXUAL CAMERAS IN HIS ROOM, DEATH, BLIND, RAPE, AND FORCING HIM INTO MENTAL ASYLUMS, TO NAME JUST A FEW OF THEIR CRIMES, NOT ASKING TOO MUCH?  IF CHOOSING MY OWN SWEETHEART AND TREATED EQUALY UNDER LAW ARE TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR, THEN I AM GREATER THAN THE COUNTRY'S FIFTY NINE POINT TWO MILLION PEOPLE TOGETHER, AS THEY HAVE HAD TO JUMP OVER THEM TO GIVE ME SPECIAL TREATMENT.  THAT WEAKENS THE STATE AND IF THIS COUNTRY DID NOT HAVE A QUEEN, AND WAS A REPUBLIC BRITANNIA, THEN IT WOULD BE ON A CATASTROPHIC CRISIS MUCH MORE THAT THIS ONE WE ARE NOW FACING.

THE KINKY ALLIANCE OF BLOODY HILLARY AND HER FOUR BRITISH CORGIS, HAVE BLOWN EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTION AND CREATED CRISIS OUT OF NOTHING.  THAT IS WHY IT ALWAYS PAYS TO HAVE GREAT LEADERS HAS POWER DOES NOT GO TO THEIR HEADS AND THEY CAN THUS SEE THE BIG PICTURES AND NOT BE PANICED BY NOTHING. 

I HAVE NOT BROKEN A SINGLE LAW WHICH MAKES ME NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CRISIS WHICH IS MUCH MORE BIGGER THAN ANTONY EDEN'S EXIT FROM SUEZ.  IF I AM THAT GREAT THAT I HAVE TO BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY THAN THE
OTHER FIFTY NINE POINT TWO MILLION PEOPLE, CALL ME 'CHRISTOPHER THE GREAT,' BUILD BE A CASTLE AND GIVE ME A TITLE JUST UNDERNEATH THE QUEEN WHO REALLY IS GREAT.  I DID NOT MENTION MY SWEETHEART IN THAT LAST SENTENCE BECAUSE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME, BRITISH POLITICIANS ONLY EVER TRIED TO PAIR THE KING OR QUEEN, AND THEY HAD CHOICE.  MY LOVE LIFE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU AND THE LAW IS BEHIND ME. 

IF YOU WANT TO HIDE YOUR JEALOUS OBSESSION THAT YOU HAVE PLAGUED MY LIFE WITH OVER THE LAST ELEVEN YEARS, BY COMMITING VIOLENCE ON ME, THAT WILL NOT HIDE IT.  AS A LAW ABIDING CITIZEN I WILL THUS BE A MARTYR OF JURISPRUDENCE.  I DO NOT WISH TO BE A MATYR, I AM NOT A SOLDIER, I AM NOT A DICTATOR AND I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICS. 

THIS IS YOUR CRISIS AND WHAT EVER YOUR JEALOUS EMOTIONAL CONTRADICTIONS, THAT IS YOUR OPPINION, I WILL BE TREATED EQUALLY UNDER LAW AND HAVE JUSTICE FOR THE LAST ELEVEN YEARS OF MADNESS THAT YOU HAVE INFECTED MY SPHERE WITH.  I WILL NOT BE TOLD TO CHANGE BY YOU, I WILL TELL YOU TO CHANGE, I WILL TELL YOU TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE AND I WILL TELL YOU TO GROW UP.  IF YOU CANNOT LEAD WITHOUT RESORTING TO TYRANNY AND TERRORISM, THEN THAT IS YOUR PROBLEM AS I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICS.  IF YOU COME INTO MY WORLD THE WAY THAT YOUR KINKY ALLIANCE HAS AND TRY TO RULE WITH FEAR AND PERVERSION, THEN I WILL NOT ACCEPT IT UNDER ANY SITUATION.  I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU LIKE BLOODY HILLARY, IT IS NOT ABOUT EMOTION OR OPPINION, IT IS ABOUT LAW.  IF YOU FIVE ARE NOT BIG ENOUGH TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURES, THATS YOUR ISSUES.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Archaic Etonian Musket

On this day of our Lord, 14th August 2013, Britain’s once proud reputation as an island of jurisprudence and a subjective cloak of morality, has been seriously challenged by a Toffs’ Rebellion .  This challenge to our rights, have made me question the paradigm of our democratic status-quo.  This new polity defined as a Magna Britannicus Fascismo,   as created an Orwellian ubiquity of intrusion and terror.  Big Brother does not effect everyone directly, though the indirect effects has built up an unstoppable presence to the periphery and has now begun an unfettered attack on the children, without clemency or civilised protocols.  This offensive as been an attack on their innocence, virtue, culture and values.  This essay will  attempt to understand the headman of the Toffs’ Rebellion and ask the question, “Is this a war against the Age of Enlightenment’s values and principles?”  If it is, then will absolutism return to a digital age with the ...

FOR WANTON MALICE

The powers that be, does not like me to write bloggs, or express myself under the Human Rights Act 1998.  I was once told a saying by a Northampton brethren, which still holds true to me today.  He said, "It is better to be hated for being who you are, that to be loved for being someone you are not."  Such great words, I then thought and it defines to me the virtues of integrity, the virtues of humility and the virtues of uprightness.  One must sometimes be hated by evil men, to be noble and good.  Our radical politicians have caused me much trouble, over the past 12 years, by stealing my wages and implementing terror on my passive personification.  Wanton malice have up warded the dregs of tyranny, from whence carnal plot and mischief have plagued our once democratic periphery.   This link defines the centuries old British government policy of divide and rule .  It was a clever and sometimes woeful strategy, that created an empire, of...

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...