Skip to main content

Paid for with British Taxes

I will now exercise my freedom of expression in my bedroom.  As I have confused many of you by not embracing the stereo-types you wish to judge me by, when it would be more civilised and intelligent to just focus on the laws which are being broken on me.   I would like to dedicate more of my time in writing my novel, but one needs to understand the mind of the despotic politicians who have tortured me for eleven years for not embracing their views on how a black man, with an education in England, should be sexually.  As I am writing a crime novel, set in London’s inner city, they would use my creative environment, which I have invented, has a psychological sensationalised backdrop for even more human rights abuse.  I would in fact create the scenery for my own carnage.
 
When people are not intelligent enough to focus on the core issue, which here is law, then they open the doors of mind control (propaganda.)  I have not incited any form of hatred, crime or antisocial behaviour.  An educated black man does not always mean a soft black man, a weak black man or an abnormal black man.  There is nothing at all wrong with education in any race, ethnicity or culture.  I have had a university education, so I do know a few things.  My knowledge does not in any way make me a threat to the social order.  I am not a radical and were I free from their crimes of passion, then in the business world I could in no way be viewed as any form of threat. 

Put criminal surveillance in an educated man’s rooms, take away all of his legal rights, threaten him to perform cheap tricks and broadcast him to the world and there will be a few problems.  Can he really be blamed for it, when he has not broken a single law, by the criminals who have?  Are the politicians with all their responsibilities, and previous education, not capable of such primitive foresight as to the problems that could be ensued by such tyrannical, perverted behaviour in front of the world? 
Is it not easy to blame me for their crimes, when all they had to do was to follow British Constitutional Law? Does that not make what I keep on repeating liberty, justice and the rule of law, not only a moralistic endeavour to follow, but also the smart choice?  Should it not be they who are teaching me this?  Have they not had eleven years to work this all out for their selves?  I have done nothing wrong, so will be damned if I will be held responsible for the incompetence of politicians.  Regardless of one’s perspective on anything, it is always sensible for politicians to lead by example and follow the rule of law.  If they chose not to, then it is their folly, and it is their neck not mine.   

Now if weak and vain politicians wish to put criminal surveillance cameras in my bedroom, coupled with the fact that I am not allowed to work, because I am sectioned because of their torture, plus the fact that they make the outside world unstable for me by making all types of human rights violations of threats of blindness, police brutality, mental asylum, murder, rape, HIV, threats to family, unless I follow their policy of becoming gay, then off course I will stay home and protest.  There is not a single threat that they can make in the world that would let me give up my legally defined human rights.  Not one!

I am not soft, but as I will not be gay under any circumstances for money, blindness or murder then I have no option but to eradicate evil and defend the rights of man adopted in law by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, many decades before my birth.  Even though many people do not trust the words of a black man, my words will be written in my own blood.  I has a British subject have rights under the laws and will not be perverted in anyway by British politicians who have lost their way and forgotten that it is we the British people who employ them to represent us.  Any kinky fantasies they vividly imagine the black law-abiding intellectual to perform, for the sake of their self-esteem and sense of superiority, if it falls outside of the laws and you have no jurisdiction in the statute book to delegate such a request on a subject of the crown, I advise you to make it law and applicable to the entirety of the land and I will then commit suicide.  As it is not the law, you cannot force me to carry out any off your kinky fantasies, so you will have to kill me. 

In addition, I am not and have not been playing any off your games.  It is not a legal requirement for you to make me play any game, without contractual agreement, a clear defined set off rules, the rule of law still taking presence within my life and my human rights protected.  I do not want to die, or be subject to any off the despotic crimes of racial scientific servitude because of politicians raised with privilege, thinking that this makes them not vulnerable to the civilised laws of the land, which are there to proclaim the highest order of civilised utopia.  I have no choice, as I will not fulfil the fantasies of throbbing, carnal, ministerial enterprise. 

Article I  (Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
 
Let the noose of freedom choke, and turn red the neck of tyranny on which the mind of evil rests and who is pleasured by the suffering of virtue and peace!
 
 

CLICK ON PICTURE TO BUY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...

My Electronic Letter to Amnesty International

Dear International Secretariat I am a law abiding upright member of society of the United Kingdom, who have endured eleven years of Human Rights Abuses, because politicians of government and opposition became jealous of my mind.  They have tackled this jealousy by destroying my life and removing the laws necessary for human advancement.  They have also breached libel laws of both defamation and slander, by spreading false malicious rumours that I am homosexual.  They say that if I do not become gay then they will murder me, so I am expecting my death because I will not be sexualised in such an evil way.  They say that the other option would be to be a man of the cloth, which I also refuse.  Though I respect Christian leaders, I have no aspiration of such a career, as it is just not me and under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which governs the world, and the European Convention of Human Rights, which governs our laws in the United Kingdom, I have th...

An Archaic Etonian Musket

On this day of our Lord, 14th August 2013, Britain’s once proud reputation as an island of jurisprudence and a subjective cloak of morality, has been seriously challenged by a Toffs’ Rebellion .  This challenge to our rights, have made me question the paradigm of our democratic status-quo.  This new polity defined as a Magna Britannicus Fascismo,   as created an Orwellian ubiquity of intrusion and terror.  Big Brother does not effect everyone directly, though the indirect effects has built up an unstoppable presence to the periphery and has now begun an unfettered attack on the children, without clemency or civilised protocols.  This offensive as been an attack on their innocence, virtue, culture and values.  This essay will  attempt to understand the headman of the Toffs’ Rebellion and ask the question, “Is this a war against the Age of Enlightenment’s values and principles?”  If it is, then will absolutism return to a digital age with the ...