Skip to main content

Don't tell anyone, but....

EVEN THOUGH I WAS FAR FROM AN ANGEL IN MY YOUNGER DAYS, THAT RAP I MADE UP WAS FICTIONAL AND DID NOT HAPPEN.  I MEAN I EVEN DIED IN IT.  I THEN LIVED THE WRONG WAY AS I MOVED TO LONDON WITH A CHILD’S MIND AND WAS THUS MATURED AROUND WOE.  I WROTE IT WHEN I WAS IN THE PRISON BLOCK, FOR SIX WEEKS FOR BEATING UP AN OFFICER.  I DO NOT CONDONE THAT LIFESTYLE AS I NOW VIEW IT TO BE SELF DESTRUCTIVE. 
RAPPERS WHO USE THEIR SOCIOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL REASONING IN MUSIC TO ARTISTICALLY ENTERTAIN IS FINE.  SHAKESPEARE'S PLAYS ARE FULL OF CRIME AND VIOLENCE.  IT IS JUST THAT ONE IS WRITTEN AND ONE IS SPOKEN.  WHEN I LISTEN TO ANY MUSIC WHICH IS COLLOQUIAL, DEROGATORY AND REJECTS CONSERVATIVE VALUES, THAT IS FINE BECAUSE I WILL NOT BEHAVE IN THE WAY THAT ANY OF MY FAVOURITE ARTISTS PREACH, NO MATTER HOW MUCH OF A FAN I AM.  PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT EDUCATED OR ARE IMPRESSIONABLE DO SOMETIMES LOOK AT THEIR RAP STARS AS GODS.  WHEN I WAS YOUNGER I WAS THE SAME, MY FAVOURITE MUSICIANS WERE WRONGLY MY GODS, WHOSE WORDS WERE LIKE LAW.  NOW I HAVE MY OWN MIND.
SHAKESPEARE CLAIMED THAT HIS VIOLENT PLAYS ‘CLEANSED THE SOUL.’ THAT IS BECAUSE WHEN HE WROTE CRIME OR WOE, THE READER OR, AS IT WAS IN ELIZABETHAN TIMES, THE PERSONS ATTENDING THE THEATRE COULD ENJOY THE ART WITHOUT DOING IT THEMSELVES.  FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS NOW ONE OF THE MOST VALUED LAWS OF MODERNITY AND WITHOUT IT, WE WOULD RETURN TO THE DAYS OF THE BURNING OF THE PERCEIVED WITCH OR HERETIC AT THE STAKE, LIKE THE VICTIM OF JOAN OF ARC OR THE CULPABLE BLOODY MARY.  SO LET NOT THOSE WHO CLAIM TO DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF MAN, SELF ESTEEM BE SO LOW THAT THEY NEED TO SEXUALISE EXPRESSIONISM AND BUGGER THE MIMICKING PARROT!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Archaic Etonian Musket

On this day of our Lord, 14th August 2013, Britain’s once proud reputation as an island of jurisprudence and a subjective cloak of morality, has been seriously challenged by a Toffs’ Rebellion .  This challenge to our rights, have made me question the paradigm of our democratic status-quo.  This new polity defined as a Magna Britannicus Fascismo,   as created an Orwellian ubiquity of intrusion and terror.  Big Brother does not effect everyone directly, though the indirect effects has built up an unstoppable presence to the periphery and has now begun an unfettered attack on the children, without clemency or civilised protocols.  This offensive as been an attack on their innocence, virtue, culture and values.  This essay will  attempt to understand the headman of the Toffs’ Rebellion and ask the question, “Is this a war against the Age of Enlightenment’s values and principles?”  If it is, then will absolutism return to a digital age with the ...

FOR WANTON MALICE

The powers that be, does not like me to write bloggs, or express myself under the Human Rights Act 1998.  I was once told a saying by a Northampton brethren, which still holds true to me today.  He said, "It is better to be hated for being who you are, that to be loved for being someone you are not."  Such great words, I then thought and it defines to me the virtues of integrity, the virtues of humility and the virtues of uprightness.  One must sometimes be hated by evil men, to be noble and good.  Our radical politicians have caused me much trouble, over the past 12 years, by stealing my wages and implementing terror on my passive personification.  Wanton malice have up warded the dregs of tyranny, from whence carnal plot and mischief have plagued our once democratic periphery.   This link defines the centuries old British government policy of divide and rule .  It was a clever and sometimes woeful strategy, that created an empire, of...

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...