Skip to main content

The 30 Questions of Speculation & Humility

  1.  Did not the age of enlightenment, which led to the American and French revolutions, not teach government the essence of humility and discretion? 
  2. At the beginning of the 21st century, can the digital age really be defined as the return of the western despot?
  3. Does the rule of law, no longer matter to the haughty narcissistic sociopath?
  4. Should it be viewed has an act of rebellion for one to proclaim the laws which one was born with?
  5. Has the government become Goliaths who are no longer answerable to the rule of law?
  6. Does their privileged upbringing make them so out of touch, that they think that with the click of a finger one would change one’s sexuality, to live up to their perverted ideals of permissiveness?
  7. Alternatively, am I out of touch, for daring to use my freedom of expression, which is enshrined in British law?
  8. Alternatively, should I not worry about my right to privacy because of their threats of disability, family murders, poverty, rape, mental asylum, prison, blindness, HIV from woman or homelessness?
  9.  Are such threats in the home not defined as torture?
  10. Regardless of one’s opinion about one’s sexual orientation, does opinion or speculation override the rule of law?
  11. Are we the victims of a nanny state with perverted molesting rulers?
  12. Was I confused to think that the rule of law was applicable to everyone?
  13. Are these types of crimes of passion, not a slap in the face to all of those who bled for liberty, democracy and the rule of law, in the Second World War?
  14. Are the government not making eloquent speeches about the scourge of sexualisation?
  15. Does not attempting to turn heterosexuals into homosexuals not constitute a more psychotic and a perverted act of sexualisation?
  16. Do not Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and David Cameron always shout from the rafters about the importance of Human Rights?
  17. Is integrity now a dirty word?
  18. What type of examples are they setting for the children?
  19. When Britain has the highest prison population in Europe, should they not lead by example by obeying the laws?
  20. Does their attempts to become allied with the federal government of the United States of America, for the endeavour of a kinky blood pact of sexualisation, not take bullying to a new epoch of weakness?
  21. Was it not this type of tyrannical bullying which created that great nation, which was revolutionised because of the discriminations of the rights of man?
  22. Would not the citizens of that republic, who are our great American brethren, not rise up against a perverted despot and demand the appreciation of their beautiful civilised values of liberty, democracy and the rule of law, which their utopia constitution both entitles and promotes?
  23. Are bullies strong?
  24. Are those who live by an upright moralistic value system and statute protocol weak?
  25. Did their expensive schools and universities make them better than the rest of us?
  26. Did their upbringing not teach them the basics of what was right from wrong?
  27. Can weak men really handle power without it going to their heads?
  28. Is it not the great leader whose self-esteem is intact, so much to the point that he need not declare war on liberty loving innocence and virtue, but instead blazes a trail for integral jurisprudence and humility?
  29. Are they not now, too big for their boots?
  30. If they have outgrown their boots, would it not have been more economically prudent to have used the British taxpayers’ money to invest in new boots, before spending it on an eleven years campaign of terror, in an attempt to achieve criminal passion, lust and envisioned egotistical power, from the grooming and groping of sordid democracy?
 
 

 

 
CLICK ON PICTURE TO BUY
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...
1 comment
Read more

My Electronic Letter to Amnesty International

Dear International Secretariat I am a law abiding upright member of society of the United Kingdom, who have endured eleven years of Human Rights Abuses, because politicians of government and opposition became jealous of my mind.  They have tackled this jealousy by destroying my life and removing the laws necessary for human advancement.  They have also breached libel laws of both defamation and slander, by spreading false malicious rumours that I am homosexual.  They say that if I do not become gay then they will murder me, so I am expecting my death because I will not be sexualised in such an evil way.  They say that the other option would be to be a man of the cloth, which I also refuse.  Though I respect Christian leaders, I have no aspiration of such a career, as it is just not me and under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which governs the world, and the European Convention of Human Rights, which governs our laws in the United Kingdom, I have th...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Archaic Etonian Musket

On this day of our Lord, 14th August 2013, Britain’s once proud reputation as an island of jurisprudence and a subjective cloak of morality, has been seriously challenged by a Toffs’ Rebellion .  This challenge to our rights, have made me question the paradigm of our democratic status-quo.  This new polity defined as a Magna Britannicus Fascismo,   as created an Orwellian ubiquity of intrusion and terror.  Big Brother does not effect everyone directly, though the indirect effects has built up an unstoppable presence to the periphery and has now begun an unfettered attack on the children, without clemency or civilised protocols.  This offensive as been an attack on their innocence, virtue, culture and values.  This essay will  attempt to understand the headman of the Toffs’ Rebellion and ask the question, “Is this a war against the Age of Enlightenment’s values and principles?”  If it is, then will absolutism return to a digital age with the ...
Post a Comment
Read more