Skip to main content

A Cause for Eclectic Nature

As a free member of the Afro-Caribbean-British ethnic group, I am playing classical music at present because I love classical music.  All music genres are forms of artistic expressionism.  If one does not like classical music, or any other genres, then it does not define them in a negative or positive way.  People can appreciate any artistic genre they wish because only the weak are influenced negatively by art form. 

Like the blockbusters at the picture show (movies), which are a more lengthened and visual artistic form of the creative director, the film (movie) that one watches does not define one’s character, sexuality, fortitude, culture or morality, but defines one’s mode of entertainment appreciation.  This is also relevant to music; one cannot truly be tarnished with an untoward reputation because of the art that one enjoys.  Some art forms do not suit one’s stereotypical classification, by the society of one's residence, especially from those who are defined with the identical labels.  However, can one who is eclectic really be at fault for the ideals of others, in a supposedly free world, which promotes freedom of expression in their legal codes? 

Therefore, even though one might conflict with stereotypical attitudes, embedded in the cognitive hemisphere of the brain, everyone in the free world must be able to express their appreciation for artistic subjective beauty in a way that suits one’s artistic nature and not be tarnished with slander or abuse for it.  There are no rules for artistic appreciation, as beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.  Therefore, let not the eye of progress and individuality be burnt out by the eye of woeful obsession and satanic despotism.  For then would not the entire world be blind to the beauty, of the laws of civilised virtue and enlightened libertarianism?

 
CLICK ON PICTURE TO BUY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

YOU DID! WE KNOW! IT’S UP, WE SAW! YOU’RE IN!

“Justices and judges of courts at all levels continue to find cross examination not only a necessary, but also a sufficient method of confronting a variety of trial evidence and burdens.”  “According to McCormick, as early as 1668 a court rejected an out-of-court statement because “the other party could not cross-examine the party sworn.   “Professor Langbein tracked this as the transition from “[t]he oath based system [that] presupposed the witness’s fear that God would damn a perjurer. . . .”   was quoted by Jules Epstein, Associate Professor of Law at Widener University School of Law. To the average citizen of the Western World in 2013, such a statement is too obvious to even allow the brain cell to process methodically.  Those who are of a reasonable age will remember the echoes of nostalgic crisis and the call for patriotic vigilance in the defence of democratic values, libertarian ethos and lawful decency, during the Cold War.  W...

My Electronic Letter to Amnesty International

Dear International Secretariat I am a law abiding upright member of society of the United Kingdom, who have endured eleven years of Human Rights Abuses, because politicians of government and opposition became jealous of my mind.  They have tackled this jealousy by destroying my life and removing the laws necessary for human advancement.  They have also breached libel laws of both defamation and slander, by spreading false malicious rumours that I am homosexual.  They say that if I do not become gay then they will murder me, so I am expecting my death because I will not be sexualised in such an evil way.  They say that the other option would be to be a man of the cloth, which I also refuse.  Though I respect Christian leaders, I have no aspiration of such a career, as it is just not me and under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which governs the world, and the European Convention of Human Rights, which governs our laws in the United Kingdom, I have th...

An Archaic Etonian Musket

On this day of our Lord, 14th August 2013, Britain’s once proud reputation as an island of jurisprudence and a subjective cloak of morality, has been seriously challenged by a Toffs’ Rebellion .  This challenge to our rights, have made me question the paradigm of our democratic status-quo.  This new polity defined as a Magna Britannicus Fascismo,   as created an Orwellian ubiquity of intrusion and terror.  Big Brother does not effect everyone directly, though the indirect effects has built up an unstoppable presence to the periphery and has now begun an unfettered attack on the children, without clemency or civilised protocols.  This offensive as been an attack on their innocence, virtue, culture and values.  This essay will  attempt to understand the headman of the Toffs’ Rebellion and ask the question, “Is this a war against the Age of Enlightenment’s values and principles?”  If it is, then will absolutism return to a digital age with the ...